Innovation Series: Advanced Science

Volume 2 · Issue 4 (2025)

A Theoretical Model of the Impact of Performance Appraisal Politics on Work Engagement

 

Peng Ding, Qingqing Yang

College of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410000, China

 

Abstract: This study focuses on the impact of performance appraisal politics on work engagement. Drawing on Social Exchange Theory and Conservation of Resources Theory, it introduces self-efficacy as a mediating variable and perceived organizational support as a moderating variable to explore the relationships between individual and organizational factors in the context of performance appraisal politics and work engagement, thereby constructing a theoretical model. Theoretically, this research aims to introduce a new research perspective based on previous scholarly work to explain the influence mechanism of performance appraisal politics on individual behavior. Practically, it seeks to provide methodological recommendations for enhancing individual work engagement.

 

Keywords: Performance Appraisal Politics; Work Engagement; Self-Efficacy; Perceived Organizational Support

 

References

[1]
Chen, Y. Y., & Zhang, Y. C. (2008). Political considerations in performance appraisal: A content analysis-based study of Chinese contextual characteristics. Management Review, 20(9), 39-49, 64.
[2]
Zhang, G. J. (2023). Research on performance appraisal deviation. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press.
[3]
Tsui, A.S., J. L. L. Farh. Where guanxi matters relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations,1997(1)
[4]
Gioia, Dennis A. Pennsylvania State U, Smeal Coll of Business Administration, Dept of Management & Organization, US; Longenecker, Clinton O. Delving into the dark side: The politics of executive appraisal. Organizational Dynamics,1994, Vol.22(3): 47-58.
[5]
Zhao, S. S. (2012). Performance appraisal politics and individual knowledge-sharing behavior: An empirical study. Nankai Business Review, 15(3), 150-160.
[6]
Zhao, J., Zhang, Y. J., Liu, Z. Q., & Liu, Y. J. (2022). Structural dimensions of performance appraisal politics and their impact on counterproductive work behavior. Management Engineering Journal, 36(1), 99-110.
[7]
Kahn, William A. Boston U School of Management, MA, et al. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal,1990, Vol.33(4): 692-724.
[8]
Schaufeli, Wilmar B.,Bakker,et al. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2004, Vol.25(3): 293-315.
[9]
Bandura, Albert. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review,1977, Vol.84(2): 191-215.
[10]
Eisenberger, Robert, Huntington, et al. Perceived Organizational Support. Journal of Applied Psychology,1986, Vol. 71(3): 500-507.
[11]
Homans, George C. Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Socilolgy,1958,63(3): 597-606.
[12]
Blau, P. M. (1988). Exchange and power in social life (X. Sun, et al., Trans.). Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House.
[13]
Hobfoll, Stevan E. Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. American Psychologist,1989, Vol. 44(3): 513-524.
[14]
Liao, H. H., Huang, L., & Hu, B. (2022). Conservation of resources theory in organizational behavior: Evolution and challenges. Advances in Psychological Science

 

Download PDF
Innovation Series: Advanced Science, ISSN 2938-9933.