Innovation Series: Advanced Science (ISSN 2938-9933, CNKI Indexed)

Volume 3 · Issue 6 (2026)
34
views
DOI number:
10.66521/2938-9933-2026061701

Injury Mechanisms of an Unrestrained Occupant in Urban Bus Frontal Collisions Based on a Human Finite Element Model

 

Kang Li, Shihai Cui*

School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, China

Corresponding Author: Shihai Cui

 

Abstract: To investigate the injury mechanisms of an unrestrained occupant in urban bus frontal collisions, a simulation study was conducted based on a validated THUMS AM50 human finite element model and an urban bus finite element model. A typical seated occupant posture was established, and a frontal collision acceleration-time curve was applied as the boundary condition. The occupant kinematic response and biomechanical injury indicators of the head, neck, and abdominal organs were analyzed. The results show that, during the frontal collision, the occupant moved forward significantly under inertial loading and the head violently impacted the front-row seat, resulting in a high risk of head injury. The HIC15 and 3 ms resultant acceleration of the head center of mass were 915.1 and 96.3 g, respectively, both exceeding the corresponding low-performance limits. The BrIC value was 0.8, corresponding to an approximately 30% probability of AIS 4 brain injury. In addition, the maximum principal strain of brain tissue reached 38.8%, exceeding the injury threshold of 17.7%, indicating a strain-dominated risk of brain tissue injury. In contrast, the cervical von Mises stress, cervical mechanical loads, Nij, and abdominal organ MPS values were all below the corresponding injury thresholds. Therefore, under the frontal collision condition, the primary injury risk for an unrestrained bus occupant is concentrated in the head and brain, while the risks of severe cervical structural injury and abdominal organ injury are relatively low. The findings can provide a theoretical basis for the optimization of bus interior structures and occupant protection systems.

 

Keywords: Human body finite element model; Urban bus; Frontal collision; Occupant injury; Biomechanics

 

References

[1]
ZHOU H C, CHEN Y, NI D, et al. Severity of passenger injuries on public buses: a comparative analysis of collision injuries and non-collision injuries. Journal of Safety Research, 2020, 74: 55-69.
[2]
KUZNETCOV A, TELICHEV I, WU C Q. Numerical parametric study on factors affecting passenger safety in motorcoach frontal collision. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2017, 22(2): 214-223.
[3]
PALACIO A, TAMBURRO G, O'NEILL D, et al. Non-collision injuries in urban buses: strategies for prevention. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2009, 41(1): 1-9.
[4]
HE C, ZHANG X Y. Study of the injury analysis and safety design improvement of the bus in the typical position. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 308-310: 2379-2383.
[5]
OLIVARES G, YADAV V. Injury mechanisms to mass transit bus passengers during frontal, side and rear impact crash scenarios[C]//Proceedings of the 21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Stuttgart, Germany, 2009.
[6]
QIAN P, SUN T, ZHU P, et al. The influence of coach interior partitions and seat leaf-tables on occupant injury in a frontal collision. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2022, 27(2): 337-346.
[7]
SUN T, RIPIN M Z, YI P C, et al. The effect of sleeping posture on occupant injury in frontal coach crashes. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 10659.
[8]
MU P F. Development and application of an injury bionic model of the 50th percentile male occupant with Chinese anthropometric characteristics. Tianjin: Tianjin University of Science and Technology, 2024.
[9]
CUI S H, MA W S, LI H Y, et al. Finite element analysis on head injury of child occupants in city bus. Automotive Engineering, 2021, 43(3): 414-420, 428. DOI: 10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2021.03.015.
[10]
BAUMGARTNER D, WILLINGER R, SHEWCHENKO N, et al. Tolerance limits for mild traumatic brain injury derived from numerical head impact replication[C]//Proceedings of the 2001 IRCOBI Conference. Isle of Man: IRCOBI, 2001.
[11]
ZHANG L, YANG K H, KING A I. A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2004, 126(2): 226-236. DOI: 10.1115/1.1691446.
[12]
HERNANDEZ F, WU L C, YIP M C, et al. Six degree-of-freedom measurements of human mild traumatic brain injury. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2015, 43(8): 1918-1934. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-014-1212-4.
[13]
CARTER D R, HAYES W C. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 1977, 59(7): 954-962.
[14]
MELVIN J W, STALNAKER R L, ROBERTS V L, et al. Impact injury mechanisms in abdominal organ. Warrendale: SAE International, 1973: SAE Technical Paper 730968. DOI: 10.4271/730968.
[15]
YAMADA H. Strength of biological materials. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1970.
Download PDF
Innovation Series

Innovation Series is an academic publisher publishing journals and books covering a wide range of academic disciplines.

Contact

Francesc Boix i Campo, 7

08038 Barcelona, Spain